It appears as if the addage “never let a good crisis go to waste” is ringing especially true with the current financial crisis ravaging the economies of the world, but especially the former economic powerhouse, the USA. Rohm Emanuel’s famous quote regarding the current financial crisis, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste…it’s an opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before.” Indeed, according to a former professor of Public Administration at the University of Windsor, “governments use crises to push their agendas.”

Employing a crisis to push a specific policy agenda is certainly not new, as many past events such as government sponsored terror or false flag incidents have shown. It appears that the Canadian government is using its illegitimate power over the Canadian people to push a certain agenda in the form of the long suspected goal of a North American Union similar to the European Union. This is just another step on the treacherous road to continental integration and a North American Union on the European model in an incrementalist fashion.
[ad#fncsrndm468ad1]
See the press release on Harper’s website here.

“The CentrePort Canada initiative involves using the James Armstrong Richardson International Airport and surrounding land as a hub to import goods from Asia and Europe and then distributing those goods throughout North America by air, rail and road. The governments of Canada and Manitoba are jointly funding the next phase of this project, which involves building a high-speed transportation corridor.”

Flashbacks:

• Ignatieff on Obama visit: Crisis an opportunity for continental, global integration
• $12B for infrastructure forms key pillar of stimulus package
• Architect of North American integration urges reboot
• Border ‘two-headed monster,’ industry minister says
• “North American Parliament” Meets At Integration Forum
• Continental Business Lobby Releases List of Priorities for Government to Address at SPP Talks
• New Documents Reveal North American Union PR Campaign
• North American Union plan headed to Congress in fall

[ad#fsbo468ad1]

Area mayor questions wisdom of CentrePort plan in region frequently flooded

National Post, PATRICK WHITE

WINNIPEG — With long stretches of Manitoba’s roads and rails submerged beneath floodwaters that continue to baffle forecasters, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced his government’s support yesterday for the construction of a Winnipeg-based road and rail hub.

The federal and provincial governments will chip in more than $100-million each to build a four-lane expressway that would link CentrePort – a 20,000-acre manufacturing, warehousing and transportation depot slated for construction near the Winnipeg airport – with major rail and highway networks.
[ad#yhoolstor468ad1]
The announcement was made as flood-protection officials upgraded crest forecasts along the Red River to the third-highest levels in the past 100 years.

Mr. Harper, who spent much of the day with Manitoba Premier Gary Doer touring the sodden Red River Valley by helicopter, pledged federal assistance to homeowners.

“The federal government stands ready to assist in any way that is needed,” he said.

But as money flows into the CentrePort project, one southern Manitoba mayor questioned the appeal of a North American hub that relies on transportation arteries so frequently severed during times of flood.

“If we want to be recognized as a mid-continental trade corridor we have to able to provide the transportation, and right now that’s where we are lacking,” said Dale Hoffman, mayor of Morris, Man., situated 70 kilometres south of Winnipeg. “We have to get our highways out of the floodwaters first.”

Morris sits along Highway 75, the main road between Winnipeg and the U.S. With a ring dike surrounding Morris sealed off due to high water, traffic is detouring 45 minutes around the town.

Mr. Hoffman showed Mr. Harper around the town’s extensive dike system yesterday, but said he didn’t have time to suggest solutions to the highway problem.

One of Mr. Hoffman’s proposals involves digging a channel along the Red all the way from the U.S. border to Lake Winnipeg, a 180-kilometre span.
[ad#vstaprnt468ad1]
“You’re talking possibly a 50-year project,” he said. “What we need is a vision for how we’re going to stop the flooding from happening every third year.”

Mr. Doer said he discussed flood-proofing Highway 75 with Mr. Harper yesterday.

[ad#equifx468ad1]
“We have five or six options we’re looking at,” he said.

Meanwhile, some residents north of Winnipeg whose houses were battered by automobile-sized ice pans over the weekend returned to assess the damage. In all, floodwaters have damaged about 200 homes, the province says.

In St. Laurent, 90 kilometres north of Winnipeg, overland flooding crept across half the town’s roads yesterday, swamping basements and causing cancellation of school bus service.

“This is the worst I’ve ever seen,” said town councillor Hugh Sigurdson. “All the water decided to come at once and come with a bang – and it’s not done yet.”

Indeed, flood forecasters raised the expected crest of the Red River in Winnipeg by half a metre yesterday. The city asked for volunteers to top up 60 dikes and raise 40 more.
[ad#symym468ad1]
Chief provincial flood forecaster Alf Warkentin said unprecedented ice cover, high local runoff and an unusually long crest north of the border have all worked to complicate his projections.

“Forecasting is never 100 per cent accurate,” he said. “Sometimes you get a little surprise.”

The world scientific community, including many disease research organizations, and scientific experts have been predicting an over due appearance of a pandemic similar to the Spanish flu and the black plague for many decades now. The former was responsible for the death of some 50 million people worldwide in the first half of the 20th century (1914) and was so deadly that the victims’ corpses were quickly and effectively destroyed due to fears of re-emergence. The death of 50 million people devastated world economies because of both human capital loss, but also mass protectionism due to quarantined borders.

History suggest a new pandemic is long overdue, but has been delayed by accidental discoveries of anti-biotics. Politicians can ignore it, like they are effectively doing concerning the economic crises, but eventually it comes around full force, hitting victims devastatingly hard. The three pandemics of the 20th century were all linked to birds, but the new emerging viral disease has spread to humans, pigs, and other species; effectively crossing species gaps. The worry here is that viruses and bacteria have been quickly adapting to conventional medicine’s arsenal of anti-biotics and anti-virals, respectively.

It appears as if the cheerleaders of the re-emergence of such a deadly flu similar to those described above is making headway onto the human race. Indeed, academics and scientists such as Dr. Pianka, formerly of Texas University, was a large proponent of the re-emergence of a deadly flu to advocate killing off 90% of the human population in order to save the planet. “He then showed solutions for reducing the world’s population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” writes Mims. “War and famine would not do, he explained (WND, 2006). “We are turning the planet into a “fat human biomass,” Pianka said. “[Disease] will control the scourge of humanity,” he told the audience.

[ad#ehlth468ad1]
It looks as if Dr. Pianka will get his wish, as there are four manifestations, commonly used by God in The Bible, for executing judgment upon people who reject Him and His commandments. These four are: the sword, famine, wild beasts and plague (see Ezek. 14:21). These are repeated over and over and are also mentioned in conjunction with the plagues of Revelation. Humanity has many sins to pay for indeed. The strange thing here is that Dr. Pianka is not the only person or group of people who have advocated for the extermination of a large segment of humanity, or the “useless eaters” as Henry Kissinger was quoted as saying. Henry represents the collective interests of the New World Order chiefly spoken through groups like the Council of Foreign Relations.

A New Plague?

The global pandemics that the 21st century encountered 6-8 years ago such as SARS and the outbreaks of bird flu in China have been the contemporary outbreaks that worried global scientific communities and spurred tremendous amounts of conspiracy theories. Infections like the bird flu encountered in China were suspected as being the proof that the influenza virus was on its way to spreading to humans; crossing the barrier from species to species. Indeed, this was the case with the H5N1 virus that did spread to humans, but was mainly contained in areas like China thanks to quick quarantines. he World Health Organisation has warned that H5N1 could seed a human pandemic that could infect one fifth of the world’s population, and hospitalise 30 million, of whom some 20 per cent would die (WHO, 2006).
[ad#fsbo468ad1]
In a strange series of coincidences, President Obama, while visiting Mexico during his trip in April, 2009, came into contact with a man infected with the suspected emergence of the next major flu pandemic spread by contact with swine. Obama was received at Mexico’s anthropology museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following day from symptoms similar to flu, Reforma newspaper reported (Bloomberg, 2009).

Pandemics encourage protectionism?

Pandemics, if they were allowed to flourish, would easily do so even easier than the outbreaks of the early 20th century because of the increased mobility of humans. Increasing trade between countries with diverse cultures and standards, courtesy of the so called free trade agreements amorously pushed by the world’s elite, make it easier for people and transport to easily spread disease. To curb outbreaks, governments of the past have utilized border restrictions and outright closures of them to halt outbreaks, but the World Health Organization (WHO) believes there is no need to close Mexican border despite over 1,000 cases of human infections with swine flu registered in the country, Mexico’s health minister said Friday (Xinhua, 2009). The caveat here is that they say this because they do not wish to spur even further protectionism that the financial crisis of late has been encouraging.

[ad#intl468ad1]

The media and business community has been feverishly hyping and trumpeting the economic crisis that started in September as if they were blindsided by it like a drunk crashing into a crowd full of people on a friday night drive. What God commands Christians regarding alcohol is to avoid drunkenness (Ephesians 5:18). The Bible condemns drunkenness and its effects (Proverbs 23:29-35). While the common person may be fooled by the economists and mainstream media gurus, the knowledgeable person knows that this economic crisis has been a long time in the making.

The reliance on credit, loans, mortgages, and imaginary money was not always so prevalent as it is in today’s society. Back in the day, people actually used to save, nations used to produce and consume at a somewhat level rate, and countries were composed of somewhat homogeneous populations accounting for a relatively stable society and economic system.
[ad#equifx468ad1]
The problem the world finds itself in now was mainly caused by government intervention in economies through the introduction of central banking in the early 20th century after the tragic “war to end all wars.” These interventions were offbeat solutions proposed by the socialist politicians of the time; many of which were brainwashed by socialist and communist propaganda — remnants from the great World Wars. The common man saw the idea of collectiviziation of resources as a pseudo tribal activity. The problem now is that government has run rampant with power usurped from decentralized actors known as states and provinces.

Most countries in the world now have central banks and heavy hands of federal government where power is wielded by power mad politicians. This power started to really take heed during the crises of wars like Vietnam where President Nixon imposed a totally fiat money, or government issued currency system whereby he took the US dollar completely off of the gold standard based on the Bretton Woods agreement established at the end of World War II. This quickly ended the government limitations to creating money, or credit, without a physical limmitation such as gold. Now all money is basically printed out of thin air from digital computer banks.

Governments are not the only entities issueing and utilizing credit. As you probably guessed, common people are now being suckered into using credit as a day to day living arrangement paying for such things as food, gasoline, and heat and has become increasingly prevalent as such. People have been using the first “plastic money” ever since its introduction in 1951 and it has been increasing ever since then. In a perhaps ironic arrangement, the first credit cards were issued for “Diners club” card holders and was made on February 8, 1949 by Frank McNamara, Ralph Schneider, and Matty Simmons at Major’s Cabin Grill, a restaurant adjacent to their offices in the Empire State Building. The very thing that keeps people alive (food; real), has become the very thing that will destroy them (credit; fake).
[ad#fsbo468ad1]
Indeed, the current economic crisis has blatantly exposed the weakness of the “In God We Trust” slogan engraved on most of, if not all, American currency in the form of loss of consumer confidence in the economic system caused by engineered financial meltdowns such as the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac loan crisis. “The financial crisis provides our great opportunity to set the world on a new sustainable path, as many sacred cows, which have stood in the path of change, are being slaughtered by the day as the crisis unfolds” (Club of Rome, 2009).

in Exodus 22:25, Leviticus 25:35-36, Deuteronomy 23:19 and other places God’s Law forbids interest on money; “thou shalt not steal” is the Law. “Thou shalt not charge interest of your neighbor,” is the Statute. The Judgment or penalty for charging interest and theft by deception via a debt-usury banking system could be anywhere form making restitution all the way to capitol punishment.

[ad#nypas468ad1]

Once again, it was the Roman soldiers who mocked Jesus in Matthew 27 31 just as they are mocking Mr. Schiff in this video. After they had mocked him, they took off the robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him away to crucify him.

The credit crisis is about to expand into other areas of the economy dependent on this imaginary bond and promise of payment: the credit card industry. Since 1951, when the first credit cards were issued, over 6 billion credit card offers were found in our mailboxes, an average of 6 offers per US household per month (2005 statistics). The average American household’s credit card debt in 1990 was $2,966. In 2007 it was $9,840. It is clear that another crisis is emerging; one that could very well be the final nail in the coffin of main street. Indeed, credit cards are shaping up to be the next chapter in the financial meltdown, promising to stymie consumer spending, drag on the economy and force a whole new wave of financial difficulty on Americans.

The US may be moving into the next phase of the mortgage crisis. It’s called the credit card crisis. Which means there may be more defaults, lower spending limits, and perhaps higher interest rates for the 75 percent of Americans who have credit cards.

When times get tough, you do what you have to do to pay your bills. For more people, that means maxing out credit cards to put food on the table and gasoline in the family car, even paying the mortgage. Financial experts say it’s a road to disaster.

Living off credit is not doing a lot of Americans much good as their debt and defaults continue to rise. “Well, this is going to be as bad as the recession of the early 90′s,” said Tom Davidoff, Asst. Professor at Berkeley’s Haas School of Business. Davidoff says we’re seeing the next phase of the worsening economy.

“Wages are lower. People make less money. That means, one, they can’t pay the bills they already have and, two, they’re feeling stretched so they’re not going to pay for stuff with cash. They’re going to pay with credit cards. That’s going to raise their credit card balance and make it more attractive to wipe out the debt by default,” said Tom Davidoff (ABC News, 2009).

Absolute Proof The Financial Crisis Was Engineered

Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers’ ability to repay, making loans with deceptive “teaser” rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets (Washington Post, 2005).

“Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” author John Perkins argues that the United states has created a modern-day empire through the use of economic blackmail and the undermining of foreign governments. Perkins zeroes in on hot spots around the world such as Venezuela, Tibet, Iraq, Israel, Vietnam and others and exposes the network of events in each of these countries that have contributed to the creation of the American Empire and international corruption. John Perkins spent three decades as an Economic Hit Man, business executive, author, and lecturer. He lived and worked in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and North America.
[ad#opxprs468ad1]
Then he made a decision: he would use these experiences to make the planet a better place for his daughter’s generation. Today he teaches about the importance of rising to higher levels of consciousness, to waking up – in both spiritual and physical realms – and is a champion for environmental and social causes. He has lectured at universities on four continents, including Harvard, Wharton, and Princeton.

[ad#yhoolstor468ad1]

Written by EconoChristian.com with various sources stated herein.

Most major media outlets, politicians, business people, and government officials have officially announced that the world has entered a recession, while some have declared much worse: a depression that makes the last Great Depression of the 1930s look like a walk in the park. While the media is busy boosting its ratings with such doom and gloom verbiage, it rarely is able to mention how or why we are in the current financial situation we find ourselves in.

They rarely mention the root causes, let alone the real problems people are facing in the economy as people lose their livelihood and finances. The world geo-political structure should be looked at similarly to building a house: we should be looking at the foundation first, and then the very top. Disappointingly, the major media outlets only look at the very top, or the exterior of the building.
[ad#fncsrndm468ad1]
Slowly, America is being turned into a service sector based economy, where a majority of the occupations are preoccupied with servicing products manufactured elsewhere, while the supposed home head quarters of corporations which manufacture items out of the country remain in the home nation. Indeed, and similarly in Canada, three quarters (3/4) of the economy is service based while establishment, shill economists and financial gurus tout such a fact as advancement or a progression of an economy from one step to another. While this sounds convincing, because it comes from the mouths of credentialed individuals and orgnaizations, the truth is that when products are no longer produced, money is no longer made; it is simply redistributed from one place to another, much like the tenets of socialism.
[ad#opxprs468ad1]
The key fact is that manufacturing is the back bone of an economy because this sector is the one which actually produces tangible items. Some might say that intangible items like financial services, computer programs, and the like are products, but the reality of the situation is that these activities can be done almost anywhere in the world by anyone. What will stop these industries from fleeing just as manufacturing did? Indeed, they would flee even faster due to their nebulous nature. We have seen are only in the infant stages of the off shoring phemonenon of industries such as financial services and computer programming by large multi national companies.

Some facts and figures:

The US global merchandise trade and current account deficits hit annual rates of $900 billion in the fourth quarter of 2005, which amounted to 7 percent of US GDP, twice the previous record of the mid-1980s (as a result of which the dollar declined by 50 percent over the three-year period 1985–87). The deficits could reach annual rates of $1 trillion within the next year or so.

China’s role in the global imbalances is even greater than these numbers might suggest. A substantial increase in the value of the Chinese currency, the renminbi, is essential to reduce the imbalances, but China has blocked any significant renminbi rise by intervening massively in the foreign exchange markets, buying $15 billion to $20 billion per month for several years to keep market pressures from pushing its currency up. China apparently sees its currency undervaluation policy as an off-budget export and job subsidy that, at least to date, has avoided effective international sanction (Peterson Institute, 2006)

Figure 2. Rising imports fuel trade deficit with China : Canada-China trade, customs basis

[ad#yhoolstor468ad1]

Manufacturing is not an industry that any country wants to fiddle with, as has been displayed with countless other economies in the past who have attempted to send their higher cost positions to other countries have shown. According to the WTO[PDF], only 20 percent of the trade among the regions of the world is in services; the rest is in merchandise. So the fact that 65 per cent of the US economy is part of the non governmental service economy, most of this output can therefore not be traded for manufactured goods. Therefore, the current US trade deficit that threatens the value of the US dollar cannot be closed unless some of the manufacturing industry is returned to US soil.

As if manufacturing industry leaving the United States and Canada weren’t enouogh, so called free trade and crony capitalistic, governmental intervention in the economy is allowing high skilled jobs — the very ones that politicians and academics touting as the savior for the economic oes we are facing — are being off shored or taken by cheap foreign workers from places like India through the H1B visa program. This visa program has been a contentious program especially among the service sector workers of the United States; particularly so around the era of the dot com bust of 2000 to 2001.

According to some economists, manufacturing is a wealth-producing sector of an economy, whereas a service sector tends to be wealth-consuming (“No Light at the End of the Tunnel” & Moneterism is not enough). Emerging technologies have provided some new growth in advanced manufacturing employment opportunities in the Manufacturing Belt in the United States. Manufacturing provides important material support for national infrastructure and for national defense.

On the other hand, most manufacturing may involve significant social and environmental costs. The clean-up costs of hazardous waste, for example, may outweigh the benefits of a product that creates it. Hazardous materials may expose workers to health risks. Developed countries regulate manufacturing activity with labor laws and environmental laws. In the U.S, manufacturers are subject to regulations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. In Europe, pollution taxes to offset environmental costs are another form of regulation on manufacturing activity. Labor Unions and craft guilds have played a historic role negotiation of worker rights and wages. Environment laws and labor protections that are available in developed nations may not be available in the third world (this is the case in places like Mexico and China). Tort law and product liability impose additional costs on manufacturing (Wikipedia, 2009).

Why is this happening?

5. To bring about the end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call “the post-industrial zero-growth society”. Excepted are the computer- and service industries. US industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labor is available. As we saw in 1993, this has become a fact through the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA. Unemployables in the US, in the wake of industrial destruction, will either become opium-heroin and/or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination of the “excess population” process we know of today as Global 2000 (Educate yourself, 2009)

Watch the full video here
[ad#rsmrt468ad1]

Written by EconoChristian.com with various sources listed herein.

Here is the latest newsletter/article from Elliott Wave, one of my favorite trend researching and investment companies on the web today.

Think That Central Banks Move the Markets? Think Again
April 23, 2009

By Mark Galasiewski

The following is excerpted from Elliott Wave International’s Global Market Perspective. The full 120-page publication, which features forecasts for every major world market, is available free until April 30. Visit Elliott Wave International to download it free.

Conventional wisdom says that central banks can influence or even direct financial markets and the macroeconomy. The very existence of Elliott waves challenges such assumptions. For if markets responded to every central bank directive, how could Elliott waves exist? Parallel trend channels, Fibonacci price relationships, the similarity of form between waves of different sizes and time periods—none of that would be possible. Central bank decisions would have to coincide perfectly with turning points in Elliott waves, and we know that just doesn’t happen. But even without using waves, we can expose the conventional wisdom for the fallacy that it is.

Take, for example, this assertion in a recent article in a U.K. economic weekly: “Part of the aim of central banks in driving down interest rates is to encourage a greater risk appetite among investors.” Two key assumptions underlie that statement: a) central banks determine interest rates; and b) lower interest rates can increase society’s appetite for risk.

To see how the first assumption is false, let’s take a look at the daily chart of Australian interest rate data. It duplicates a study that Elliott Wave International has often done with U.S. interest rate data. It shows how movements in the cash target rate set by Australia’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), appear to follow those in 3-month Australian Treasury Bills. After decisive moves up in T-bills from 2006 to early 2008, for example, the RBA faithfully raised its target. T-bills have since led the RBA during the financial crisis of the past year. In fact, the record indicates that the RBA almost always follows T-bills over time.

The proper conclusion to draw is not that the RBA has orchestrated the decline in rates since the early 1980s—but that it’s been riding it. During good times, central bankers look like geniuses; during bad times, they get tarred and feathered. Closer to the truth is that their interest-rate decisions are not proactive, but reactive, and that they continually follow in the footsteps of the market for lack of any other useful guide.

Now let’s look at the second assumption: that lower interest rates increase society’s appetite for risk. A simple glance at the weekly chart shows this assumption to be false. After the 1987 crash, the ASX All Ordinaries actually rallied for two years on rising rates and then sold off through 1990 on falling rates. Stocks then rose in 1991 on continued falling rates and sold off in 1992 on even lower rates. Continue following the chart to the right and you will see that there is no consistent correlation between the direction of interest rates and that of the stock market.

The myth of central bank potency is so pervasive that conventional analysts can’t even imagine a better explanation for price trends: that the market is the dog wagging its central bank tail, not the other way around.

---

For more information, download Elliott Wave International’s FREE issue of Global Market Perspective, available until April 30. The 120-page publication covers every major world market, global interest rates, international currencies, metals, energy and more.

---

Mark Galasiewski is the editor of Elliott Wave International’s Asian Financial Forecast and member of EWI’s Global Market Perspective team covering Asian stock indexes.

Yesterday U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama agreed with Canadian Prime Minister Harper that his pre-election platform and promise to voters that the his administration would consider re-negotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) would not be honoured during his presidency, according to major media outlets.

At a time when the US is reeling with insanely lopsided trade imbalances; at a time when the national debt stands at an astronomical 15 trillion dollars; and at a time when society is destabilized to a breaking point, yet another would be savior politician crushes his electorates’ dreams. Why people expected anything different? Only God and the people who run the show behind the curtains know why for sure.

Obama the Traitor

President Barack Obama wants to work with the leaders of Canada and Mexico to strengthen the North American Free Trade Agreement without renegotiating it, his top trade envoy said.

“The three leaders are all of the mind that we should look for ways to strengthen NAFTA,” U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said Monday. “I think they can be addressed without reopening the agreement” (Detroit News, 2009).

Not only has the Obama administration flopped on his pledge to renegotiate NAFTA, he also received orders from his masters to further alienate the American people by not naming China — the world’s biggest exporter and holder of American debt — a currency manipulator, when in fact they are and have been since 1994 when they pegged their currency to the US dollar until 2005 (and then it became a managed float).

Obama spoke of China’s perfidious practices. He spoke of how NAFTA cost a million jobs. He promised change. And now, with no new facts to justify the switch, Obama has adopted the very positions he attacked. Does this matter? The election is long past. Perhaps it is just naïve to think that politicians will keep their word. This is hardly the idealism that Obama ran on (Foreign Policy, 2009).

[ad#lflck468ad1]

Do you want to learn more about the Obama deception? It is clear that he has pulled the wool over our eyes and lied to the entire world, but mainly the American people. Like all politicians and people who are put into power by a faulty voting system, the real change that is necessary will not come from him.

The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people.

The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery.

We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order’s plans. It’s not about Left or Right: it’s about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation.

Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda. If you want to know the facts and cut through all the hype, this is the film for you.

Watch the Obama Deception and learn how:

• Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law.
• Obama’s handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force.
• International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government.

[ad#prcln468ad1]

• Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government.
• The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

[ad#nypas468ad1]

Don’t pay taxes now; pay taxes later. If you take in that concept during the working years, during the retired years, and during the time of estate planning. if you do this your family will be hundreds of thousands — perhap millions of dollars better off, and that should be the theme. We should start with the concept of delayed tax paying while your are working, though.

A case study is a woman who was having her tax return prepared. She had a choice: put money into her retirement plan at work, or put her money outside the retirement plan at work, and she wasn’t sure what she wanted to do. It would be highly advantageous for her to pick the package offered by her workplace. What kind of an impact would this have on her and if she had invested outside of her retirement plan? She was going to earn money at work and pay the taxes on that. She was going to take the money after she paid the taxe, and she was going to invest that money; then she was going to pay the tax on the divident and capital gains as opposed to investing money in the retirement plan at her workplace.

The money invested in her retirement plan. The money invested in her retirement plan will not be taxed until she withdraws it. It is true that when you withdraw it you will have to pay taxes. Indeed, delaying the paying of taxes will have a hue impact on her life because she will have invested all that money that she would have otherwise had to pay in taxes, and over a period of time if she had put only $5000 per year in her retirement plan versues putting the money somewhere else, she would have had an extra $7000 to $8000 at the end. If continues this theme of delaying taxes, the differences over her lifetime would almost be 2 million dollars.

Here is a different view on paying income taxes:

[ad#opxprs250ad2]

Jury says refusal to pay tax not crime
Sonja Puzic and Dave Battagello
Windsor Star
Tuesday, June 27, 2006

A Superior Court jury ruled late Monday that a Windsor optometrist was not guilty of tax evasion when he refused to pay nearly $350,000 in income taxes over five years.

Dr. Jack Klundert hugged his lawyer, Doug Christie of British Columbia, and wiped tears from his face and glasses after the jury was discharged. He smiled faintly at his wife, who sat in the courtroom and took notes.

Superior Court Justice Joseph Quinn thanked the jury for tackling “the complex issue.

“These decisions are not easy to make,” he said.

SECOND TRIAL

Klundert, 53, was standing a second trial for tax evasion under the Income Tax Act. He failed to pay $348,231 in taxes on income estimated at $1.5 million between 1993 and 1998.

Klundert was found guilty of making a false statement on a tax return in 2002 and fined $80,000.

He was also ordered to enrol in a constitutional law course as part of his two-year probation.

But the Court of Appeal found fault with Superior Court of Justice Steve Rogin’s instructions to the jury and Klundert took his protest against Revenue Canada to court again.

He told the jury he wrote zero income on his tax forms because he believed the federal government had no constitutional right to pursue him. He said disclosing his earnings to the government would be like “sitting down with thieves” and telling them where his valuables are kept.

---

The media likes to spin this story to make it look like he is avoiding paying taxes. The real truth is that he is trying to prove that the Federal government has been taking power away from the provinces for the past 90 years and by refusing to pay income tax to the Federal government, they won’t be allowed to hoggle all the money that the Provinces should be getting directly.

There are generally four types of real estate properties out on the market today: There is raw land, farm land, residential land, and commercial land. So, when you look at the types of properties we’re dealing with, people will ask “what’s the different between raw land and farm land?” raw land has no income purpose since God created it so it just holds the world together. You probably wouldn’t want any of that because you have to pay cash for it. Now, farm land is highly specialized in that it has income because the farmer has potential to get income from that land.
[ad#fsbo468ad1]
So, it’s a different category from vacant land or raw land, and farm land. The two areas that we will be concerned with are primarily residential real estate and commercial real estate. Let’s look at what the differences would be:

If you look at residential real estate there are three types: Condominiums, Single Family homes, and small multi-units. Where did the commercial term come from? When you look at it, it’s likemulti-units. It comes from a financing term, and this term has to do with office buildings, strip malls, industrial lots, etc. There are two types of loans in real estate: residential loans and commercial loans. IF you are buying a single family home, or a duplex or up to a four plex, you would have to apply for a residential loan.

Canadian Outlook

If you’re looking to buy, it’s great news, but if you already own, it’s terrible: According to new evidence, Canadian home prices could decline by 20 per cent, may not hit bottom until late 2011. It
could be seven years or longer before prices recover to today’s levels. Maclean’s senior editor Duncan Hood reveals a frightening new forecast made by a brand new housing futures market. The new market allows sophisticated investors to bet on where house prices are going, and it predicts that prices will fall by much more than most economists are predicting right now (Macleans, 2009).
[ad#fsbo468ad1]
European/UK Outlook:

The message is clear: the property market is set to continue to fall throughout 2009. Yes, Britons are to witness thousands of pounds being wiped off the value of their homes, according to banks, estate agents and other sector commentators. According to a recent report by the Land Registry, the average price of a property stood at £161,883 in November. This marks a 1.9 drop from October’s prices and a 12.2 per cent reduction from the same month in 2007. Every region in England and Wales saw a decrease in property values over the past year (Know your money, 2009).

American Outlook:

Americans fear home prices will drop more sharply in the coming year, despite government efforts to resuscitate the battered real estate sector, according to a poll released on Friday.

U.S. homeowners surveyed by Reuters and University of Michigan predicted their home values would fall by 2.2 percent in the year ahead, the biggest anticipated decline in the past few years (Yahoo, 2009).

[ad#intl468ad1]

Any unit, if its a multi-unit, those have residential loans and the rules are totally different for them. If you hear someone say “you don’t qualify” they are tlaking about a residential loan because you are the person qualifying for the loan, but in commercial the property is the criterial for qualification. So, because there are two types of real estate, an office might not be zoned commercial in some areas and be zoned “O” zone and so on. So, zoning issues can be fairly complex. So, under financing commercial would probably be your best bet in terms of investments.

Universities in Ontario are not the place to be to receive quality education, research shows. Indeed, Ontario is the most under funded, most understaffed, and has the most amount of students per teacher ratio in all of Canada. According to a Statistics Canada report released a day after the 1998 “students’ budget,” students are paying more than ever for their university education. After inflation, tuition fees have leapt 62 per cent since the beginning of the decade, while family incomes have dropped by 5 per cent.

Comment from “A born and rised here taxpayer”
Thu, Apr 24, 08 at 09:13 AM
There are no jobs in Canada now for people born and raised here. It is just another example of how our government takes from tax paying Canadians that were born and raised here and gives it to these people that should not be here in the first place. We need to take care of the people here first. I am sick of these people coming over here for a free ride on taxpayers’ money and taking everything from us. I feel sorry for the younger people this country has been taken over by them and has gone to hell!

In 2008, students are expected to shoulder, on average, a 28,000 dollar debt after graduating from a Canadian University. The problem is that Canadian Universities are not available to Canadians because of the Foreign Students from China, and that Canadian Universities are using our tax dollars to fund education in China. This is called “brain drain,” where students come to Canada to take advantage of tax payer subsidized education, and leave to their home countries, often flipping the bill and not paying a cent.

Scholarships: Unfair or a helping hand? By Monica Wolfson. Windsor Star. Friday, April 06, 2007.

The University of Windsor is coming under fire for luring first-year students to campus with lucrative scholarships that administrators know students will forfeit within the first year because they can’t make the grades.

Almost eight in 10 first-year students who received academic entrance scholarships in September lost them by December because they were unable to get an A- average. Three years ago, U of W administrators designed a program to boost enrolment by offering financial incentives to high school graduates.

That’s done, even though officials knew few students would get the money beyond the first four months, according to data and a report obtained by The Windsor Star through the Freedom of Information Act.

“I would characterize this as nothing short of false advertising because the institutions know full well how few students will maintain this scholarship,” said Jesse Greener, Ontario chairwoman of the Canadian Federation of Students. “It’s kind of like getting kids smoking. You need to get them in the door and it’s a captured market after that. People are committed to getting a degree because you have to in this market. The opportunities to reconsider another school after the loss of a scholarship aren’t there” (Windsor Star, 2007).

HENDERSON: A strike of mutual destruction

Asked what steps he would take to turn the university around if he were in charge, the prof said both the faculty and administration would feel the heat.
[ad#esyedg468ad1]
For starters, he said, accountability to the students, the reason the university exists, would be foremost. “If you’re not pulling your weight, you are fired. So what if you have tenure? Sorry. You are out.” In reality, said the prof, it’s almost impossible to get fired at U of W. “You probably have to kill somebody.”

He said it’s appalling that the university churns out graduates, weaned on multiple-choice exams marked by computers, who can’t compose a sentence or “think their way out of a wet paper bag.”

Meanwhile, said the prof, the bloated administration could easily be cut by 50 per cent, freeing up large amounts of money. He said it’s ridiculous that some faculties, which used to have a dean and one secretary for 2,000 students, now have as many as a dozen computer-equipped staff supporting a lesser number of students (Windsor Star, 2008).

EDUCATION SERVES ITS PURPOSE

As you’ve gathered by now, education is not intended to uplift and empower. The world is run by a secretive interlocking cartel that controls the education system. Its goal, in the words of one of its founders Cecil Rhodes, is to “gradually absorb the wealth of the world.” Naturally it wishes to obscure the truth. It wants students to be confused and stupid. Professors who don’t play this game are fired.

Ironically most Great Men were bad students or didn’t attend university at all. “If I had my way I’d burn every one of them to the ground,” George Bernard Shaw said. “They stereotype the mind” (Henry Makow, 2003).

Education: Reality 101 in Canadian Universities

Like university presidents across the country, Szathmáry is learning some hard lessons in a highly demanding subject. Some might call it Reality 101. Its prerequisites are a tough skin and a keen eye for the bottom line. Its required assignments are to predict and play the marketplace of ideas, divest the enterprise of weak divisions, and maximize returns to nervous investors. Its instructors? Hard-nosed governments and a student body that has transformed itself from Generation X into Generation Y. Why can’t professors spend more time ensuring that courses are professionally relevant? Why is the focus on expanding the intellect rather than expanding marketable skills? Why don’t four years of hard work and high bills lead more directly to a good career? “It’s pretty simple,” says Trevor Lines, president of the University of Manitoba Students’ Union. “The university has got to learn some priorities. It has to zero in on what it does well, what it doesn’t, and what exactly its tuition-paying clients need to survive in the outside world.”
[ad#esyedg468ad1]
In fact, both students and governments are becoming downright dictatorial in their quest to turn the ivory tower into a sleek and efficient employment machine. Slashing budgets, politicians are taking a firm hand in the division of the spoils: diverting scarce resources to vocational training, pressing universities to work more closely with local colleges, dispensing seed money to private-sector educators, and setting aside special funds for universities that produce job-ready graduates or that replace traditional classrooms with high-tech, on-line learning. “There are some who think this will all go away,” says UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN president George Ivany. “That’s bullshit. We are witnessing a fundamental reorientation of how we operate, what we offer and who we are” (MacLean’s Magazine, 1996).

Where is the accountability?

In the Ontarian schooling system (in Canada), the Universities, colleges, and post-secondary institutions are empowered under an enabling act and are bound by provisions of different provincial statutes (ie. The Expropriation Act). In addition, because these institutions receive public funds directly in trust (by way of endowments), there are therefore restricted by the rules of accountability. This essentially means they are accountable to the public for demonstrating where the public funds were spent for the goals intended, and to see that it is spent in an efficient and economical manner. However, as all pundits of economics know, and what the economic and historic models show, is that government is not capable of being effective when power is taken away from individuals.

This means that University administrations are supposed to be responsible for the management of the public funds they receive for collective purposes (very broadly for education and research), but who watches the watchers? Supposedly the board of governors serve this function, but the reality of the situation is that this board is largely a controlled aspect of University Chief Executive Officers’ preferences with no real stated process for reporting their effectiveness to taxpayers. Indeed, the MUSH sector (Municipal, Universities, Schools, and Hospitals) does not guarantee public accountability of funds with regards to University effectiveness (or lack thereof). This fact is so credible that even the Ombudsman of Ontario admitted it:

“Ontario has fallen behind in oversight of non-governmental organizations providing critical public services referred to as the “MUSH” sector – municipalities (except for the ability to investigate complaints about closed meetings in some cases), universities, school boards, hospitals, nursing homes and long-term care facilities, police, and children’s aid societies (Ombudsman, Ontario, 2008)

[ad#carcstcdn468ad1]

It looks like students, home owners, business lenders, and the general population who loan money from banks and other institutions are not the only ones getting the monetary shaft these days. Indeed, students pay exorbitant loan fees and interest rates just in an attempt to compete with others both in their local economy but also in countries where educations are state subsidized and the eventual graduate sometimes immigrates to the latter student’s local economy to compete for the same jobs. Given many new immigrants are coming from minority status countries, guess who gets the job first?

International debt is a new form of slavery through which the rich nations enslave the poor with money that can never be paid back.
When countries in poverty owe large amounts of money to wealthy nations, it’s the poorest people who suffer the worst impact. The burden of debt leaves their governments precious little to improve the lives of their citizens.
[ad#lflck468ad1]
Debt becomes a trap they can’t get out of.

It’s a new kind of slavery that robs people’s control over their own futures.

Yet when a poor country’s debt is cancelled, it provides a great opportunity to improve the lives of millions of people. Let’s look at some compelling reasons why we should drop the debt.

Debt costs lives

In the world’s poorest countries, the majority of their people have no access to basics like clean water, adequate housing, healthcare and education. In spite of that, these countries must pay debt service to wealthy nations and institutions, at the expense of providing vital services to their citizens.

Consider this: Between $10 billion and $15 billion is needed a year to turn around the AIDS crisis in Africa that claims 7,000 lives a day. Almost $15 billion is paid in debt service by sub-Saharan Africa to wealthy nations and institutions every year. Where do you reckon the money should go instead?

At school in Tanzania

In 2001, Tanzania received a partial debt write-off of over $2 billion. With the money it saved, the Tanzanian government abolished school fees for primary education. Enrolment increased by 50% between 2002 and 2003. An extra 1,000 schools were built. Hundreds more teachers were trained. Books and learning materials were provided. Amazingly, around 1.6 million children were able to go to school for the first time.

Cancellation delivers results

Startling results can be achieved from even small amounts of debt relief. In Uganda, school enrolment has more than doubled. In Mozambique, it meant immunisation for 500,000 children. In Honduras, three more years of schooling can be provided.
[ad#symym468ad1]
Paid back, and back, and back

These nations have already paid back their debts ? several times over. Skyrocketing interest rates and compound interest inflate the amount and make repayment impossible.
Example: Nigeria borrowed $5 billion, paid back $16 billion to date but still owes a shocking $32 billion.

Makes foreign aid more effective

Foreign aid like that from Australia frees up money for poor countries to pay their debts to other wealthy nations and institutions. Between 1990 and 1997, developing countries actually paid more in debt service than they received in aid. If debts are cancelled, aid can be used more effectively in reducing poverty and ultimately lessen these countries? dependence on aid.

Join in to drop the debt

Without debt relief, poor countries will never be able to repay all their debts. Is there anything that ordinary people can do about it?

Yes! Millions of people around the world have joined the Jubilee ?Drop the Debt? campaign to ?drop?, or cancel 100% of the debt owed by the poorest countries.

When these countries no longer have to spend all their money paying back debt and high interest charges, they can provide much-needed services like clean water, sanitation, health and education for their citizens.

Source: Jubilee Campaign Australia